Zeitzeugengespräch zum 70. Jahrestag der Eröffnung des Nürnberger Prozesses
Am 20. November 2015 jährte sich der Beginn des Prozesses vor dem Internationalen Militärtribunal gegen die führenden Repräsentanten des nationalsozialistischen Regimes zum 70. Mal. Die Verfahren markieren den Beginn der bis heute fortgesetzten juristischen Strafverfolgung nationalsozialistischer Verbrechen.
Anlässlich des Jahrestags hatte das Memorium Nürnberger Prozesse einige der letzten Zeitzeugen des Prozesses eingeladen. Sie berichteten im historischen Gerichtssaal von ihren Erlebnissen und Erfahrungen in den Jahren 1945 und 1946:
- Dr. Yves Beigbeder, ehemaliger Assistent des französischen Richters Henri Donnedieu de Vabres
- Moritz Fuchs, ehemaliger Leibwächter des amerikanischen Chefanklägers Robert H. Jackson
- Dr. George Sakheim, ehemaliger Dolmetscher
Einführung und Moderation:
Prof. John Q. Barrett, Professor für Verfassungsrecht und Rechtsgeschichte an der St. John's School of Law in New York City und Biograph des damaligen amerikanischen Chefanklägers Robert H. Jackson.
Grußworte:
-Dr. Ulrich Maly, Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Nürnberg
- Manfred Schwerdtner, Vizepräsident des Oberlandesgerichts Nürnberg
Die Veranstaltung fand in englischer und deutscher Sprache statt.
Produziert von HD-Livestream blustop Streaming GmbH für die Museen der Stadt Nürnberg/ Memorium Nürnberger Prozesse
Eyewitnesses Meet to Discuss the 70th Anniversary of the Opening of the Nuremberg Trials
November 20, 2015, marked the 70th anniversary of the opening of the International Military Tribunal's proceedings against the leaders of the National Socialist regime. The trials were the first step in the criminal prosecution of National Socialist crimes, a process that has continued down to this day.
In observance of the anniversary, the Memorium Nuremberg Trials invited some of the few remaining eyewitnesses of the trials to return to the historic courtroom and recount some of their experiences from 1945 and 1946.
- Yves Beigbeder, former assistant of the French judge, Henri Donnedieu de Vabres
- Moritz Fuchs, former body guard of the American chief prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson
- Dr. George Sakheim, former interpreter
Introduction and Moderation:
Prof. John Q. Barrett, St. John's School of Law, New York City
Words of Greeting:
Dr. Ulrich Maly, Lord Mayor of the City of Nuremberg
Manfred Schwerdtner, Vice President of the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court
The event was held in English and German.
Produced by HD-Livestream blustop Streaming GmbH for the Nuremberg Municipal Museums / Memorium Nuremberg Trials
Nürnberg Uluslararası Askeri Ceza Mahkemesi ve Önemi
Nürnberg Mahkemesi ile ilgili bilinmeyenler, sürecin öncesi ve sonrası, mahkemeyle ilgili detaylar bu videoda sizlerle, iyi seyirler.
Kaynakça:
^
^
^ Yearbook of the Intemational Law Commission, 1950, Vol. II, pp. 374-378.[1]
^ Henkel (ed.), Matthias (2011), Memoriam Nuernberger Prozesse, exhibition catalogue (German), Nuremberg: Museen der Stadt Nuernberg, 78 pp.
^ Summary of the indictment in Department of State Bulletin, October 21, 1945, p. 595
^ Bormann judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Dönitz judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ President of the Reich for 23 days after Adolf Hitler's suicide.Judgement : Doenitz the Avalon Project at the Yale Law School
^ Frank judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Frink judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Fritzsche judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Funk judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Goering judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Hess judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Jodl judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Kaltenbrunner judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Keitel judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Von Neurath judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Von Papen judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Raeder judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Von Ribbentrop judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Rosenberg judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Sauckel judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Schacht judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Von Schirach judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Seyss-Inquart judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Speer judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
^ Streicher judgement. 21 Nisan 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.
Festveranstaltung zum 70. Jahrestag der Urteilsverkündung im Nürnberger Prozess
Der US-amerikanische Philosoph Michael Walzer und der deutsche Literatur- und Sozialwissenschaftler Jan Philipp Reemtsma waren anlässlich dieses Jahrestages eingeladen, um den Nürnberger Prozess aus moralphilosophischer Sicht zu beurteilen: Kann Nürnberg im Rückblick tatsächlich als Zeitenwende im Umgang mit bewaffneten Konflikten und den hierfür verantwortlichen Personen bezeichnet werden? Sind Politik und Gesellschaft heute eher zu Zugeständnissen der Macht an die Vernunft (R.H. Jackson) bereit?
Die alliierten Ankläger des internationalen Militärtribunals traten 1945 in Nürnberg mit dem Ziel einer Zeitenwende an, die den Umgang mit Krieg und schwerwiegenden Menschenrechtsverletzungen nachhaltig verändern sollte. Dazu entwickelten sie bereits bestehende Rechtsgrundsätze weiter und sorgten für ihre Durchsetzung. So entstand ein neues Recht, das in Nürnberg die Praxis des modernen Völkerstrafrechts begründete.
Die Veranstaltung vom 30. September 2016 im Saal 600 des Nürnberger Justizgebäudes sollte die moralische Bindewirkung des modernen Völkerstrafrechts im Kontext des 20. Jahrhunderts als einer Epoche der Gewalt und der zivilisatorischen Extrementwicklungen kritisch reflektieren.
Moderation: Patrick Bahners, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Die Veranstaltung fand in englischer und deutscher Sprache statt.
Produziert von MM FILM & VIDEO für die Museen der Stadt Nürnberg/ Memorium Nürnberger Prozesse
Commemoration of the 70th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trial Verdicts
On the occasion of the anniversary, philosopher Michael Walzer from the USA and German literary and social scholar Jan Philipp Reemtsma were invited to come to Courtroom 600 and assess the Nuremberg Trials from the viewpoint of moral philosophy. Looking back, can Nuremberg really be considered a turning point in how we deal with armed conflicts and the persons responsible for them? Have today's governments and society become more
willing to let Power pay tribute to Reason (R. H. Jackson)?
The Allied prosecutors at the International Military Tribunal came to Nuremberg in 1945 with the aim of permanently transforming how people would deal with war and severe violations of human rights. For that purpose, they expanded on existing principles of law and made sure that they were enforced. The result was a new type of law, making Nuremberg the birthplace of modern international criminal law.
The present event on 30 September, 2016, was intended as an opportunity for critical reflection on the binding moral effect of modern international criminal law in the 20th century – an era of violence and newly emergent extremisms.
Moderation: Patrick Bahners, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
The event was held in English and German.
Produced by MM FILM & VIDEO for the Nuremberg Municipal Museums / Memorium Nuremberg Trials
Memorium Nuremberg Trials Court room 600
Martin Dammann in der Kunsthalle Nürnberg
Trailer zur aktuellen Ausstellung
Wie im Kino: Multimedia soll Nürnberger Prozesse veranschaulichen
Museum Memorium Nürnberger Prozesse wird 2018 erweitert. Kern des Konzeptes ist eine museale Mulitmedia-Show im historischen
Gerichtssaal der Prozesse.
Saal 600 im Nürnberger Justizpalast.
Dieses Video wurde von einem Android-Telefon hochgeladen.
Biserica Maranata Nürnberg / Fürth.
Predică Fratele Petrica Vrabioru. 3.
Hermann Göring e o antissemitismo[LQ]
Cena do filme o julgamento de Nuremberg, Göring aponta os micros fascismo norte americanos.
Albert Speer
Berthold Konrad Hermann Albert Speer (German: [ˈʃpeːɐ̯] ( ); March 19, 1905 – September 1, 1981) was a German architect who was, for a part of World War II, Minister of Armaments and War Production for the Third Reich. Speer was Adolf Hitler's chief architect before assuming ministerial office. As the Nazi who said sorry, he accepted moral responsibility at the Nuremberg trials and in his memoirs for complicity in crimes of the Nazi regime. His level of involvement in the persecution of the Jews and his level of knowledge of the Holocaust remain matters of dispute.
Speer joined the Nazi Party in 1931, launching himself on a political and governmental career which lasted fourteen years. His architectural skills made him increasingly prominent within the Party and he became a member of Hitler's inner circle. Hitler instructed him to design and construct structures including the Reich Chancellery and the Zeppelinfeld stadium in Nuremberg where Party rallies were held. Speer also made plans to reconstruct Berlin on a grand scale, with huge buildings, wide boulevards, and a reorganized transportation system.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
Kent Hovind - Seminar 4 - Lies in the textbooks [MULTISUBS]
Creation Seminar 4: Lies in the Textbooks by Dr. Kent Hovind
WITH SUBTITLES:
Afrikaans, Bulgarian, Chinese_CS, Chinese_CT, Croatian, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Indonesian, Latvian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish
Dr. Hovind shows how public school textbooks are permeated with fraudulent information in order to convince students that evolution is true.
Topics included: the geologic column, the Grand Canyon, vestigial organs, the deception of Haeckel's embryonic research, DNA, and many more. Enjoy this point-by-point, entertaining demonstration of scientific evidence used to shed light on each of the lies still being pushed upon our culture. Learn active steps you can take to impact your public school system!
No ratings enabled because truth is not based on majority opinion.