April 2019 General Conference - ASL
All members of the Church are invited to participate in the 189th Annual General Conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The First Presidency, members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and other General Authorities and General Officers of the Church will deliver messages of inspiration and guidance in five sessions:
The general priesthood session for all Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthood holders will be Saturday, April 6, at 6:00 p.m. mountain daylight time (MDT).
The general sessions for individuals and families will be Saturday, April 6, and Sunday, April 7, at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.
NYSTV - Armageddon and the New 5G Network Technology w guest Scott Hensler - Multi Language
I remember when 3G was the latest cutting edge technology...
Now everything is switching over to 5G so what does that mean for us healthwise? What is a 5G system? Does it relate to the end time control grid they're trying to set up?
Anyone concerned with getting brain cancer should tune into this informative broadcast. Again, you will never hear about any of this on the mainstream media.
To them, cell phone represent a miminal health hazard.
5G and the Illuminati... How does it effect you?
Another great broadcast by NYSTV. Check them out. No better information out there...
Subscribe here:
freetruthproductions.com
Languages
Afrikaans
አማርኛ
العربية
Azərbaycanca / آذربايجان
Boarisch
Беларуская
Български
বাংলা
བོད་ཡིག / Bod skad
Bosanski
Català
Нохчийн
Sinugboanong Binisaya
ᏣᎳᎩ
Corsu
Nehiyaw
Česky
словѣньскъ / slověnĭskŭ
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Esperanto
Español
Eesti
Euskara
فارسی
Suomi
Võro
Français
Frysk
Gàidhlig
Galego
Avañe'ẽ
ગુજરાતી
هَوُسَ
Hawai`i
עברית
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Krèyol ayisyen
Magyar
Հայերեն
Bahasa Indonesia
Igbo
Ido
Íslenska
Italiano
日本語
Basa Jawa
ქართული
Қазақша
ភាសាខ្មែរ
ಕನ್ನಡ
한국어
Kurdî / كوردی
Коми
Kırgızca / Кыргызча
Latina
Lëtzebuergesch
ລາວ / Pha xa lao
Lazuri / ლაზური
Lietuvių
Latviešu
Malagasy
官話/官话
Māori
Македонски
മലയാളം
Монгол
Moldovenească
मराठी
Bahasa Melayu
bil-Malti
Myanmasa
नेपाली
Nederlands
Norsk (bokmål / riksmål)
Diné bizaad
Chi-Chewa
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ / पंजाबी / پنجابي
Norfuk
Polski
پښتو
Português
Romani / रोमानी
Kirundi
Română
Русский
संस्कृतम्
Sicilianu
सिनधि
Srpskohrvatski / Српскохрватски
සිංහල
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Gagana Samoa
chiShona
Soomaaliga
Shqip
Српски
Sesotho
Basa Sunda
Svenska
Kiswahili
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
Тоҷикӣ
ไทย / Phasa Thai
Tagalog
Lea Faka-Tonga
Türkçe
Reo Mā`ohi
Українська
اردو
Ўзбек
Việtnam
Хальмг
isiXhosa
ייִדיש
Yorùbá
中文
isiZulu
中文(台灣)
tokipona
Auburn Coach Wife Kristi Malzahn Agrees with Match & eHarmony: Men are Jerks
My advice is this: Settle! That's right. Don't worry about passion or intense connection. Don't nix a guy based on his annoying habit of yelling Bravo! in movie theaters. Overlook his halitosis or abysmal sense of aesthetics. Because if you want to have the infrastructure in place to have a family, settling is the way to go. Based on my observations, in fact, settling will probably make you happier in the long run, since many of those who marry with great expectations become more disillusioned with each passing year. (It's hard to maintain that level of zing when the conversation morphs into discussions about who's changing the diapers or balancing the checkbook.)
Obviously, I wasn't always an advocate of settling. In fact, it took not settling to make me realize that settling is the better option, and even though settling is a rampant phenomenon, talking about it in a positive light makes people profoundly uncomfortable. Whenever I make the case for settling, people look at me with creased brows of disapproval or frowns of disappointment, the way a child might look at an older sibling who just informed her that Jerry's Kids aren't going to walk, even if you send them money. It's not only politically incorrect to get behind settling, it's downright un-American. Our culture tells us to keep our eyes on the prize (while our mothers, who know better, tell us not to be so picky), and the theme of holding out for true love (whatever that is—look at the divorce rate) permeates our collective mentality.
Even situation comedies, starting in the 1970s with The Mary Tyler Moore Show and going all the way to Friends, feature endearing single women in the dating trenches, and there's supposed to be something romantic and even heroic about their search for true love. Of course, the crucial difference is that, whereas the earlier series begins after Mary has been jilted by her fiancé, the more modern-day Friends opens as Rachel Green leaves her nice-guy orthodontist fiancé at the altar simply because she isn't feeling it. But either way, in episode after episode, as both women continue to be unlucky in love, settling starts to look pretty darn appealing. Mary is supposed to be contentedly independent and fulfilled by her newsroom family, but in fact her life seems lonely. Are we to assume that at the end of the series, Mary, by then in her late 30s, found her soul mate after the lights in the newsroom went out and her work family was disbanded? If her experience was anything like mine or that of my single friends, it's unlikely.
And while Rachel and her supposed soul mate, Ross, finally get together (for the umpteenth time) in the finale of Friends, do we feel confident that she'll be happier with Ross than she would have been had she settled down with Barry, the orthodontist, 10 years earlier? She and Ross have passion but have never had long-term stability, and the fireworks she experiences with him but not with Barry might actually turn out to be a liability, given how many times their relationship has already gone up in flames. It's equally questionable whether Sex and the City's Carrie Bradshaw, who cheated on her kindhearted and generous boyfriend, Aidan, only to end up with the more exciting but self-absorbed Mr. Big, will be better off in the framework of marriage and family. (Some time after the breakup, when Carrie ran into Aidan on the street, he was carrying his infant in a Baby Björn. Can anyone imagine Mr. Big walking around with a Björn?)